Back to feed

No, growing more food does not mean we always need more and more inputs

Humanity's ability to produce enough food for 8 billion people is impressive. 1 In fact, we could produce enough calories for far more than 8 billion; we just feed a lot of those calories to farm animals, allocate crops to biofuels, and lose a lot of food in our supply chains. 2 The extremely dire predictions of widespread famine from the 1970s and 1980s did not come true thanks to huge improvements in crop yields, intensification, and food production.

2 The extremely dire predictions of widespread famine from the 1970s and 1980s did not come true thanks to huge improvements in crop yields, intensification, and food production. When I talk about these positive human developments — and suggest that we're more than capable of feeding another few billion people over the next 50 years — the pushback is often the same: "we might be able to produce more food, but it'll take more and more inputs".

Continue Reading on Sustainability by Numbers

This article continues with additional insights and analysis. Premium content available to subscribers.

Read Full Article on Sustainability by Numbers